15 Comments
Commenting has been turned off for this post
Wayne's avatar

Wow indeed

Jorge Mendez's avatar

This is very helpful: "The earliest Christian interpreters—long before modern literalism—read Scripture canonically: patterns, echoes, symbols, typology, thematic unity..." Literalism, especially as applied in Dispensationalism, has poked the modern Church "in the eye" causing it to lose sight of the way of interpreting Scripture you are promoting. Thanks for this teaching Geoff.

Judith Orr's avatar

Seeing the inextricable connection between the Tree of Life and the Single Eye is like finding the Pearl of great price. Thank you, Geoff , for this edifying discovery!

Geoff Stroud's avatar

Blessings Judith. Do you mind if I use your endorsement on my website?

Judith Orr's avatar

Not at all. My pleasure, Geoff

John Eli Shaphat's avatar

The schizophrenic Evil Eye of Humanism’s autonomous self-willed Sin Nature ecumenically Mirrors Democracy’s Tree of demented carnal-minded Knowledge of Good and Evil. The Single Eye is the regenerated heart returning to the holy-theocratic posture (according to the gospel of Ezekiel 36:25-27) humanity lost in Eden: receiving from one omnipotent source—the Holy-theocratic Spirt of God’s sovereign free-will Himself. And that is the sanctified essence of the holy-theocratic Tree of Life.

Isn't there more?'s avatar

Geoff, you have recognized an instructive parallel and pattern. Great work. No, it's not the basis of all my faith. No, my salvation does not hinge on it. And no, I'm not going to hell if I find too much value in it. Some people take themselves too seriously. Those are the ones it's fun to ignore! Just ignore them. You are on the right track, toward Jesus, not away from him.

Great work.

Steve S's avatar

Your teaching is beyond the comprehension of most who cannot or will not (I’m not sure which) read what the Bible says, but believe whatever they have been told it says. The devotion to trinity theory is inexplicable unless we consider how they are under a spell. Gal 3:1

Geoff Stroud's avatar

Thanks for your comment, but I made no reference to the trinity. Are you just taking a cheap shot. If so, stand in line.

Steve S's avatar

No, but you expressed a principle of cognition which goes over the head of most who are struggling under indoctrination.

Geoff Stroud's avatar

My target is not those comfortable in their ignorance.

Steve S's avatar

lol, that’s a narrow field. Like harvesting the crop of seeds spilt between the road and the fence!

Geoff Stroud's avatar

Jesus said the path to salvation is narrow. In the parable of the seeds and the sower, who are those that are saved?

Steve S's avatar

But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers and sisters loved by the Lord, because God chose you as firstfruits to be saved through the sanctifying work of the Spirit and through belief in the truth. 2Th 1:13

Truth has a lot to do with it apparently…it doesn’t say dogma and tradition!

Steve S's avatar

That will be interesting! The entire NT explains it’s all about Christ and what he accomplished and our faithful acceptance of that reality.

The clinging to an artificial Christ won’t help our cause or advance our faith. Yet all who will be born of the spirit at his return will have some imperfect understanding and that will be removed then.

God is gracious, but not oblivious.